In the 21st century, illusion is the new reality . . .                        

After the gunman's martial overture,

the drama of the century begins . . .

And in the words of Mohamed Jama himself, speaking as Abdul-Aziz, of Linwood Islamic Center fame, works his phone in the background:

The only problem is that the "live stream" of the "attack" on Al Noor Mosque clearly shows that there was no interaction between Jama and the "gunman", and that no shot was fired at Jama or in his vicinity — despite what Lumo AI says here and what Jama himself says here.

After taking a replica shotgun from the trunk of his car (see inset below) — in addition to the replica AR-15, equipped with a strobe light, which he is already carrying — the "gunman" walks down the footpath towards Jama and the unidentified woman.

As the "gunman" approaches him, Jama turns slightly to see who is coming — but does not react to the sight of an armed man wearing military gear and a helmet with a GoPro camera attached to it.

Also remarkable is the fact the "gunman" — who will later shoot at almost anything that moves — totally ignores Jama and the woman, who are obviously Muslims. They are two of the "loiterers" mentioned above, who would have been inside the mosque if there really had been a service about to begin.

Readers will find a video of Jama giving a different but equally fantastical version of his encounter with the "gunman" on Page 3 of Kufr Club. This has him running, rather than falling down and hurting his left knee. Roger Morris (https://www.rogermorris.nz/redteam/) says "Jama gave five different media outlets five different versions of [his] 'encounter' with [the gunman]," and that, "by the third interview he had forgotten what the weapon was" and had to be reminded by a minder. — Poor Jama! He seems to be in a quandary over how to present himself, at a time when so many others are being hailed as exemplars of "preternatural courage in the face of certain death" — as Jane Clifton describes the mosque "shooting victims" in her Listener column of March 30, 2019. Watch the video on You Tube.

There are only two other people who are not fired at by the "gunman" during the "shooting" at Al Noor. One is "Thumbs-Up Man" (below left), who is now seen walking towards the rear of the mosque at 6:33. The other is the unknown person (below right) sitting in the silver car, registration FQH875, to the left of the mosque entrance, at 8:49. This is the car that drives off while the "gunman" is returning to the mosque after his trip back to his vehicle. As the silver car enters the road, it knocks over the traffic cone that was placed there. The issue of the car's ownership is examined in detail here. — It is possible to speculate that all three people (or four people, if one includes the unidentified woman) are either accomplices or people who are in on the hoax. If "Thumbs-Up Man" is not an accomplice — if he is just an innocent member of the public — what is he doing wandering around to the rear of the mosque? If, on the other hand, he is an ordinary Muslim, we have to classify him as yet another "late arrival" — and one who is oddly off course.

Watch the video of the car's mysterious disappearance. View more pics of the car on the dedicated page.

Where are Wasseim Alsati and his daughter Alen?

"The last thing Christchurch mosque shooting survivor Wasseim Alsati remembers before he lost consciousness is his daughter's tiny belly covered in blood. The New Zealand barber had a rare morning off on March 15, and he decided to spend it with his then-four-year-old girl Alen Daraghmih and take her to mosque with him. 'That was her first time in life to come with me to the mosque,' Alsati told As It Happens host Carol Off. But before they even got inside Al Noor, both father and daughter were shot and left for dead. Bystanders found them and drove them to hospital." — CBC Radio, April 15, 2019. See a radically different story here.

They are nowhere to be seen as the 'gunman' comes and goes during 'attack'

Note that the silver car, shown to the right of the mosque's entrance in "First exit", is no longer there in "Second exit". It disappeared while the "gunman" was making his second entry to the mosque compound via the subsidiary gate to the left of the main gate (looking from the road). That's why his perspective is different as he approaches the mosque's entrance for the second time. One suspects the "gunman" used the subsidiary gate for his second entry to avoid an embarrassing meeting between him and the car on its way out.

But where, exactly, were Wasseim and Alen when they were allegedly shot? The above four pictures, taken from the alleged gunman's "live stream", show us what he saw as he entered and exited the mosque during his alleged shooting spree. And the father and daughter are nowhere to be seen in the immediate vicinity of the mosque during any of the "gunman's" comings and goings. In addition, the "live stream" shows that they were not, at any stage of the "shooting", on the public footpath outside the mosque. The only people the "gunman" encounters on the footpath are Mohamed Jama and the unidentified woman (see above). Furthermore, there are no "bystanders" anywhere near the mosque to mount a rescue operation. The colorful reports of wounded people/dead bodies lying all over the place, and being scooped up and rushed to hospital by Good Samaritans, are the inventions of scriptwriters and false witnesses. When the "gunman" eventually drives off, he leaves only two "bodies" — purportedly those of Ansi Alibava and Husna Ahmed (also see above).

The picture on the right was reportedly taken on April 26, 2019, during what was described at the time as a visit by Prince William to Starship Children's Hospital in Auckland. It shows Wasseim sitting beside Alen, who looks remarkably well for someone who was reportedly flown to Auckland on March 15 with life-threatening injuries. She is also lucid enough — despite her reported brain damage — to ask William about his family. — I have heard a recording of a telephone conversation in which a person, apparently at Starship Hospital, says the hospital has no record of Alen being admitted. The information I have, which comes largely from Greg Hallett, is that Alen was admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15 and discharged at 4.20am on March 16. Meanwhile, her father was apparently admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15 and discharged at 6.40pm on March 17. My understanding is that, on March 15, he was working as a barber and did not go to the mosque at any time. According to Hallett, Alsati is also a Jordanian agent. At this stage, I can't confirm any of these claims.
Alsati is mentioned here, in one of the most absurd stories to emerge from March 15.

Adeeb Sami case: Glaring inconsistencies go unquestioned

There is a mention of Adeeb Sami — the jackass who couldn't stop laughing — in the introductory paragraphs above. Click here to view the associated video, if you missed it the first time. The Gulf businessman has a page dedicated to him here. Update 23.06.24: Sami eventually regained his composure, and was a model of sobriety on the fourth anniversary of the "shootings". In an article from the Khaleej Times, there is none of the inappropriate levity that accompanied his previous comparison of the "shooting" with a scene from a movie. And interestingly, he introduces a new hero — his "friend" Abdul Fateh, a Palestinian. When Sami is hit in the back by a bullet, as the "attack" unfolds, Fateh inquires, "Are you okay?" "No," says Sami, "I have been shot." Fateh then tenderly embraces him and promises to save him, before Fateh himself is shot in the head "point blank". Despite the horrific injuries a shot to the head from an AR-15 would have caused, Fateh somehow manages to recite the Shahada while convulsing in his death throes. The story could hardly have been more fantastical if he had gone on to recite the Surah al-Fatiha, and is another example of how these people lie like children — extravagantly, recklessly and unnecessarily, in a bid to further impress their already astounded audience. (Note that Fateh's name is spelled differently in the two lists of casualties given above.)

In the above interview, Ali appears to have completely forgotten his script — the story he was supposed to tell about his father saving his life by "taking a bullet" for him. He is not a good liar. His body language is appalling. He gives every sign of feeling extremely uncomfortable, despite the reassuring smiles of other family members, including his mother, during the interview. Needless to say, he would not have forgotten this story if it had been true. It simply isn't possible for a person to forget such a profoundly moving experience. Interestingly, his older brother, Abdullah, has had nothing to say.

To read the above articles about Adeeb Sami, click on the respective images.

---

'Attack' Part 1: Anomalies from the mosque's hallway

Picture No 1: The body in the entrance shows no sign of injury, despite supposedly having been hit by a shotgun blast only seconds earlier. The clothes have been pulled up over the face, presumably to prevent identification. According to the most popular version of the official narrative, the only person standing in the doorway was Daoud Nabi — he who greeted the "gunman" with the immortal words, "Hello, brother" (or "Welcome, brother").

Picture No 2: When the "gunman" enters the mosque, there is already an ammunition magazine on the floor in the hallway. This was presumably left there by accident, after a previous take of the video. Later, the "gunman" picks it up and clips it on to his weapon. (See the audio below.)

Picture No 3: As the gunman advances, he "fires" at a man crawling up the hallway. The man clearly has bare feet at this stage.

Picture No 4: As the "gunman" walks down the hallway, at the end of his first "shooting" spree, he passes the man on the floor, who now has blue socks on. Several analysts have noticed that the crisis actors involved in this "production" are not good at holding positions, and sometimes make small changes in the interests of comfort.

The design of the carpet points in the direction of Makkah (Mecca).

---

Ammunition magazine already on the floor in the hallway

Audio uploaded to archive.org by Randy Wyzard on August 11, 2024. It deals with the issue of the magazine lying on the floor in the hallway, as well as a range of technical anomalies in the "live stream".

---

'Attack' Part 2: Anomalies from the prayer hall 'shooting'

As the "gunman" enters the prayer hall, he initially turns to the left (see inset) — but not far enough to reveal the pre-positioned heap of "bodies" in the near corner. He then turns to the right, where there is another heap of pre-positioned "bodies" in the corresponding corner. There are also two standing men, one facing the back wall of the prayer hall (and thus away from the Qibla or direction of Makkah) and the other facing the front wall of the women's room (in which no women are seen). It's hard to tell what these two men are supposed to be doing, though I speculate above, in the section on Islamic practice, that the first man could be praying, albeit irregularly. The first man is sometimes referred to as "Invincible Man", as the "shots" fired at him appear to have no effect. He turns slightly to his left and strolls away.

Picture No 1: This is the moment, at 8:33, when the gunman picks up the ammunition magazine mentioned above, clips it to his gun, and exits the mosque for the first time. Before doing this, he makes two excursions from the musallā into the hallway to reload. (His reason for reloading in the hallway is not clear.)

Picture No 2: At 10:59, after reentering the mosque, the "gunman" fires at close range into the heap of "bodies" in the corner to the right of the doorway. But a "shot" aimed at a "worshiper" wearing a white kufi (prayer cap) does nothing more than send the kufi flying — confirming that the "weapon" used is actually a replica airgun. See gif of action.

Picture No 3: As the "gunman's" GoPro camera pans around the prayer hall, it traverses the minbar (pulpit) several times, showing with reasonable clarity that there is no one hiding in it — contrary to the assertion of imam Gamal Fouda that he ducked down at the outset of the "shooting", and observed everything that transpired. No wonder they don't want you to watch the video!

---

'Attack' Part 3: Anomalies from after the 'gunman' leaves

The above screenshot is from 8:58, when the "gunman" has left the mosque for the first time. See a gif of the action. After "firing" up and down the road at nothing discernible, he returns to his car, throws his gun to the ground, and takes the remaining gun from the already-open trunk. (Yes, it remains open during his first foray into the mosque.) He then heads back to the mosque, which he reenters via the subsidiary gate to the left of the main gate — as already noted.

In response to the above evidence, Max Igan has commented: "The claims of hoax and CGI are damage control. People are being played, and if they cannot get a bit of focus, learn to think for themselves and start reporting some real truth regarding this shooting, we are going to get totally screwed over this event. When properly examined, all evidence in the actual shooter's video suggests that this shooting was real, and claiming it's fake is one of the things that is going to be used to shut us all down." (Watch Igan go head-to-head with Jim Fetzer on this issue.)

On the other side of the argument, some of the most insightful comments on these anomalies have come from Allan C. Weisbecker, who first addressed the Christchurch "shootings" on March 17, 2019, in his blog post Extended Minds: "My other thought today is from what little looking I've done into the New Zealand shootings. As I say in a comment, it so far has all the tells of a flat-out hoax, i.e., no real crime scene photos (plus photos that look fake), a lack of verifiable details, interviews with unemotional 'victims' (shades of Sandy Hook), the immediate anti-gun rhetoric..."

On March 20, Weisbecker followed this up with Poof Goes the Airgun: "The New Zealand shooter was using an air rifle of some sort, which blows a puff on each shot, so it looks like a hit. The footage was so obvious a fake that I'll not go into details. All you need see are the grabs showing the wall behind where the two main groups of 'bodies' lay. (See below.) No bullet holes. Most, if not all, of the shots would have gone through bodies and hit the wall, not to even mention misses — his ammo was not hollow point or 'frangible' (exploding). I didn’t bother to look up the specific type of weapon but it looked like a version of the AR-15. Doesn't matter." — I'm inclined to agree with Weisbecker and his correspondent Todd, who "find it ridiculous that Igan blames just about every anomaly in the shooter's footage on 'low bandwidth.' Yes, low bandwidth might 'erase' a bullet hole (on the wall, say) in one or two frames of tape, but it doesn't erase them all in every frame."

In false-flag terror events, fake bloodstains are often added to white clothing for the sake of effect. Click here for a video analysis of the top heap of "bodies", in which a real person raises a hand to shield his face from the blast of air. There is also a hand that moves in the bottom heap of bodies, seemingly to provide comfort or reassurance. See here.

The mysterious case of the dummy in the gutter that later loses its head

Picture No 1:This is purportedly the body of Indian student Ansi Alibava — one of the two women in black "shot" by the gunman as they exited the mosque compound via the side gate. A voice is heard pleading, "Help me! Help me!" as the "gunman" approaches the "body", which is lying in the gutter in front of the entrance to the alley in which he has parked his car. Note the awkwardly crossed legs, with the feet facing away from each other. Note, too, that someone has removed the shoes and placed them beside the body. This is reminiscent of the Masonic Rite of Discalceation, and is often seen at the scenes of false-flag terrorist attacks. It could thus be viewed as the "calling card" of the real perpetrators, albeit an esoteric one.

Picture No 2: At 12:07 the "gunman" fires the first of two "shots" at the "body", directly or indirectly causing a blood squib in the right sleeve to discharge.

Picture No 3: The "gunman" fires the second "shot", making the hair fly and apparently dislodging some of it.


Nathan Smith is des-
cribed in a BBC article of March 20, 2019, as a "father of three, originally from Poole in Dorset". Smith is quoted as saying that, after he escaped from the mosque, he found a young woman lying in the road beside the mosque. "I can see she's been shot so I crouch down and try to roll her over...I didn't know her name and I don't know where she's from at the time. I'm just holding her, I don't know why but I'm stroking her back — she's already dead."

If Ansi is dead, how did she really die? If she is alive, what is in the coffin in the picture below?

The picture to the left was found on the Facebook page of Al Noor Mosque shortly after March 15, 2019. Fearing it would soon be removed, I quickly copied it.



Crisis actors congregate in the alley, where they receive instructions from a police handler. Meanwhile, the "body" — purportedly that of Ansi Alibava — lies where it was "shot", totally ignored for the time being. This defilement of the area is further evidence that this is not a real crime scene. The photographer was Mark Baker, AP Southeast Asia photo editor, who just happened to be in Christchurch at the time. See the video below.


The crisis actors continue to mill around, chatting or working their phones. They look like commuters waiting for a bus to arrive. The man with the ID tag, who appears to be lost in thought, is probably an operation manager. The man in the yellow kufi (prayer hat) to the right is Al Noor imam Gamal Fouda, a former Egyptian primary school teacher.

Crisis actors regroup in Hagley Park for further instructions from police

Al Noor imam Gamal Fouda raises a pensive finger to his mouth (center right, wearing a blue robe), while a police handler tells the crisis actors what they have to do next. Everyone remains completely unemotional.


This puts everything into perspective. Al Noor Mosque is in the background; the alley, where the "body" of Ansi Alibava was found, is in the near distance; and closest to the camera is a red "X", where the "body" of Husna Ahmed was found. As pointed out elsewhere, the latter has to be the "body" of Husna because she is the only other alleged female fatality at Al Noor. Remember, too, that the official narrative has Husna being shot on entering the mosque to search for her husband.

The mystery of the windshield undamaged by three shots fired through it

After the "gunman" drives away from Al Noor Mosque, ostensibly in the direction of Linwood Islamic Center, he fires three shots through the windshield of his car, apparently without damaging the glass. He then fires through the side window to his left at two men walking through the carpark of the Argyle Motel on Deans Avenue. (These are the Muslims who are described as "running late" for the Salat al-Jumu'ah or Friday Prayer.) In this instance, the glass is shattered.

Above, in a screenshot from CCTV footage from the Argyle Motel, a man flees as he comes under fire from the "gunman's" car. In this footage, the "gunman" sounds his car horn. But in the "live stream" of the attacks, the horn is not sounded. Furthermore, the sound of gunfire in this video is different, being much louder and far more dramatic — like that of a fully automatic weapon. Below, the car, a Subaru Outback, is rammed by the police in Brougham Street, and then trucked away. According to the official narrative, this action occurs after the attack on Linwood Islamic Center.


The above picture on the right is often cited as "proof" the car's windshield was damaged. But do these pictures show the same car? Are their colors identical? How do the two backgrounds compare? Are there any bullet holes in the windshield of the vehicle on the left? Was the arrest of the "rag doll" by two "heroic" police officers (partly obscured by a censor's airbrush in this picture) just part of the "training exercise" — until the exercise "went live"? See Gareth Jacob's report, Page 11, for information about the vehicle's registration KSH90.

Not a drop of blood to be seen on any of the victims taken to hospital

There are two things to be noted in the above picture: (1) This man is not being loaded into the ambulance at the entrance to the mosque, or even at the entrance to the mosque compound, but at the entrance to the alley — where the "body" of Ansi Alibava formerly lay. And incredibly, (2) They have somehow managed to work Ansi's sneakers into the frame (see bottom left). On the face of things, this doesn't make any sense. But it must, for some inscrutable reason, have suited their purposes.

Judging from the wall and the pillar in the background, this photograph was taken close to Palazzo Lane — on the same side of Deans Avenue, but about 20 meters in the opposite direction. Click here for more pictures of "casualties".

Right and center: Temel Ataçocuğu points to where he was hit by a bullet...

...and, left, what would have happened to Temel if he had really been hit by a bullet. (Suicide attempt with a service rifle.)

"On March 15, 2019, Temel Ataçocuğu was praying in the Al Noor Mosque in Christchurch. He heard gunshots and turned to lock eyes with the gunman. He saw a puff of smoke from the rifle and then felt a bullet hit his teeth. It was the first of nine bullets to tear through his body." So begins a Frank documentary on a "survivor" of the mosque shooting who has, at times, appeared to be a spokesman for his peers. But needless to say, his story is a load of fanciful nonsense. At the moment the "gunman" enters the musalla, no one is praying — with the possible exception of "Invincible Man", who is seen standing and facing the back wall. Apart from the two heaps of pre-positioned "bodies" in the two rear corners, plus a few other "bodies", the hall is largely empty.

In the first picture above, Temel shows the documentary's interviewer where he was kneeling and praying, in relation to the hallway of Al Noor. The only problem is that the "live stream" of the "attack" shows there was no one in this position (see the picture below). In the second picture above, Temel claims congregants were screaming "Allahu Akbar". But in reality, no such screams are heard in the video. All we hear is a culturally incongruous groaning and maundering.

At 6:56, the "gunman" reaches the threshold of the prayer hall. At this point, according to Temel's testimony, we should see Temel kneeling directly in front of the "gunman" and turning to "lock eyes" with him. In reality, we see (1) a "body" to the left, already lying face-down, and (2) an indeterminate black shape to the right. Both are motionless. And remarkably, there is no one in the area in front of the mihrab (the niche that indicates the Qibla).

When considering the number of "wounded", one must also consider the possibility — perhaps probability — that some people are capitalizing on pre-existing injuries or infirmities, and claiming that these are a result of the "attack" on March 15, 2019. The testimonies of such people, and any "evidence" they supply, should be closely examined for anomalies. See Temel Ataçocuğu lets the cat out of the bag. See also Temel's "leg wound", proudly displayed on his dedicated page.

---

Is this a deadly weapon or just a 'noise-making stick'?

"Noise-making stick" is the description of Jim Fetzer — one of the many knowledgeable people (mainly Americans) who have analyzed the "shooting" in and around Al Noor Mosque and concluded that the "weapon" is actually a replica airgun of a type readily available in the United States. Such guns, which are manufactured to look and feel like real firearms, are powered by a cartridge of CO2 that fits neatly into the stock (see below), and shoot blanks, bbs (metallic spherical projectiles) and pellets. Because these are much cheaper than live rounds, replica airguns "are often used in place of their live-fire counterparts for ease of training and extra target practice" (Airgun Depot). The dealer adds: "It is often hard to tell the difference between the live-fire version and the replica gun. The markings, weight, and action are often identical." — In New Zealand, there has been much agonizing over the fact alleged gunman Brenton Tarrant was granted a firearms licence in November 2017 without being subjected to the usual regulatory regime. However, this fact is not necessarily germane to the events of March 15, 2019. In other words, the shooter's possession of a firearms licence did not determine the nature of the equipment he deployed at Al Noor Mosque, and could be no more than a decoy topic to keep official investigators of the case preoccupied.

For more details on the AR-15 and the effect its (live-fire) bullets have on the body, go to the dedicated page.

---

Evidence of Masonic/occult influence in the 'shootings'

The fish and the number 14, displayed above on the palms of John Podesta, both appear on the weapon shown in the previous section of this presentation. Podesta, a "swamp creature" who was Hillary Clinton's campaign manager in 2016, was in New Zealand on March 10, 2019, for a Global Progressives Event, and stayed until the day before the alleged shootings. While in the country, he warned that New Zealand was a "juicy target" for a major hack. — The wording on the image is not mine. The De-Occulting of John Podesta has further information.

The date of the Christchurch "bloodbath" — March 15 — is also significant. This is the Ides of March — a date associated with the assassination of Julius Caesar and ritual human sacrifice. Furthermore, March is the month of Ares (Mars in Roman mythology), the God of War who is typically accompanied by sons Deimos (representing Terror) and Phobos (representing Panic).

Finally, we should remember that (1) The shoes of alleged shooting victim Ansi Alibava were removed by unknown persons and placed beside her "body", possibly in imitation of the Masonic rite of discalceation, and (2) Jacinda Ardern was a Freemasons University Scholarship recipient in 2001. See OIA response to questions about Freemasons in the NZ Police.

The AR-15, which the "gunman" allegedly used, takes a .223 Remington cartridge. 223 is the reverse of 322 — the number that appears in the insignia of the Skull and Bones secret society. — Just another coincidence? Publisher John Leonard has suggested that "Their little numerology game helps these psychopaths enjoy their work and laugh at us mere mortals". See also how the shooting in Texas on December 29, 2019, was at Church of Christ, White Settlement, Tarrant County.

---

Could 'Tarrant' have driven to Linwood in the time frame?

The short answer to the above question — from Christchurch residents, at any rate — appears to be "no" — despite claims to the contrary in the legacy media. The NZ Herald, for instance, has the "gunman" completing the trip in only six minutes, between 1.46pm and 1.52pm. According to the Herald, he then spends only three minutes shooting up Linwood Islamic Center and dodging Abdul Aziz's eftpos machine.

— I have seen no evidence the "gunman", whoever he was, was at Linwood at any stage. The broken window (above), which has been shown repeatedly on television, was actually in the adjacent former KFC premises, and had nothing to do with the Islamic center. The policeman comforting the Muslim man must have known that. Click on the above map or here to return to the earlier discussion of predictive programming and timeline issues.

The other timeline issue: Apparently premature reports in the news media

Reminiscent of the BBC's premature announcement of the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11 were several news reports of the Christchurch "terror attacks" a day or more before the actual events.


Timelines like the one immediately above should not be uncritically accepted, as they can easily be faked or published in error. But in view of precedent, plus the phenomenon of "predictive programming", they should at least be noted. Also remarkable are these Google search results, which reportedly made a brief appearance online before March 15. There is also a video here.

When I republished the tweet on the left in a previous version of this page, and pointed out that no shooting was reported before 1.40pm on March 15, 2019, "FTGBS" responded by reposting the tweet on the right on Twitter/X and suggesting the timeline on the left was either faked or generated by a different time zone. (Time and date styles differ.) DeepSeek notes (29.01.25): "Twitter's timestamps...display time relative to the viewer's time zone, not the poster's."

See also "Christchurch terrorist discussed attacks online a year before carrying them out, new research reveals", from The Conversation of February 20, 2024. — I don't know whether these postings fall into the category of "predictive programming", which would make them the work of the organizers of the Christchurch event, or whether "Tarrant" is the author of some, or all, of them.

---

Drama Part 2: Slapstick terror comes to Loony Linwood

Above: In one of the iconic photographs of March 15, Linwood Islamic Center imam Alabi Lateef Zirullah, a Nigerian, emerges from the center with melodramatic "bloodstains" covering his white robe. Meanwhile, his accomplice, whom I have dubbed Raspberry Juice Man, carries a half-empty bottle of a red liquid, and appears shocked to see a camera pointed at him — as well he might.

Below, center: In an earlier scene — a screenshot from the infamous video — Zirullah is seen carrying a jug, or similar vessel, containing a red substance. Note that in this shot he has only one "bloodstain", and that it is over his heart. This fact effectively demolishes the explanation that, although he was uninjured, he acquired some bloodstains while helping the wounded. Yes, if there had, indeed, been wounded people in the center, he might have picked up a few bloodstains by helping them, but not predominantly over his heart.

Below, inset: The blood squib on the floor can be seen only if one views the video frame by frame.

Below, right: One of the "gunman's" weapons, which has been identified as a Ruger AR-15, purportedly lies where it was abandoned on the floor of the center (as seen in an itvNews video). But it can't have been abandoned by the "gunman", as Abdul Aziz, the "hero" of Linwood, insists the "gunman" didn't enter the center at any stage of his "attack" (see this article from Sky News). This means that any gun found on the floor was placed there by someone else — presumably by Aziz, after he chased the "gunman" and picked up one of the two weapons he claims were abandoned by the "gunman". (Aziz says that, at the outset of his pursuit, he picked up a shotgun. But the Stuff article cited below says it was the "Uberti .357 Magnum level-action rifle" that the gunman began his attack with.) This also means — if one accepts Aziz's testimony — that any persons shot inside the center were shot through a window — presumably the broken window we have been shown on television, which is actually in the adjacent former KFC building (as seen above).

As if to prove that there is no consistency in the testimonies of "survivors", Syed Mazharuddin says here that the "gunman" did enter Linwood Islamic Center. This Stuff article also has the "gunman" entering the center and dropping his second gun there, i.e. the AR-15 he retrieved when he made an interim dash back to his car — in much the same way as he made an interim dash back to his car at Al Noor. Meanwhile, Abdul Aziz claims this weapon was also discarded outside the center. Confused yet? Untangling all these lies (perverse taqiyya?) is enough to drive one to drink — not the most Islamic of solaces.

Linwood hero's tall tale ends with his arrest in a nearby supermarket carpark

Abdul Aziz, the "hero" who reportedly hurled an eftpos machine at the fleeing "gun-
man", says he (Aziz) was later arrested on suspicion he was the offender. Right: We see him protesting to a policeman in the carpark of nearby Value Mart, where he was (according to his story) searching for water for a dying "shooting victim". But can anything this notorious thug says be taken seriously?

Yet more anomalies in the Linwood Islamic Center narrative, including a partial transcipt of Vinny Eastwood's somewhat bizarre interview with "witness" Matt Williams, are on a dedicated page.

---

Why did the Muslims desecrate their places of worship?

Excerpts from an interview with Robert David Steele, a former Marine Corps officer and CIA spy who often answers questions for the Tehran Times.

Q. The attack on a mosque in New Zealand by an alleged white supremacist appears to have many questionable aspects. In broad terms, what do you think happened?

A. A careful analysis of all available information, including a complete technical as well as military analytic review of the full video tape, suggests that this was a false flag event. We need Muslim and US white nationalist investigators on the ground to determine if anyone actually died, all indications are that no one died, this appears to have been a completely staged event managed by the Mossad in complicity with corrupt New Zealand police and national authorities, and corrupt Freemasons. Let me point out that most Freemasons are honest decent people. I believe the Chinese Freemasons particularly are intent on the future of Freemasonry to be about the good of all, and this apparent crime against humanity by New Zealand Freemasons should see them cast out of the international order.

Q. Before I ask for specific reasons why you challenge the official narrative — that a lone white man killed at least fifty Muslims and wounded at least 50 more mostly Muslims — let me ask about motive. Assuming you are correct and this was a staged event followed by immediate global censorship to block common sense challenges, what was the purpose of this event?

A. I am so glad you asked that, because my answer could help to
unite Muslims everywhere with white nationalists in the USA and perhaps in other countries. This event was designed with two objectives. The first is to demonize white nationalists who support President Donald Trump, and to set the stage for disarming them in violation of the US Constitution by using a flood of new "red flag"
laws that the Deep State is attempting to push through in the USA. Just as the Zionists assassinated John F. Kennedy Junior to clear
the way for Hillary Clinton to buy her Senate seat in New York, they are seeking here to help the Democrats defeat President Trump in 2020. My colleague Scott Bennett, a former US Army psychologi-
cal warfare officer, has published a useful analysis of objectives and tactics for this event.

In New Zealand, where the government is a mix of good — criticizing Zionist Israel — and bad — seeking to confiscate weapons — this false flag event is clearly being used as a deception to justify the disarming of the public.

Q. Isn't it far-fetched to think that Muslims themselves would participate in a false flag event desecrating their own mosque?

A. You raise a very important point, and this is one of the reasons I want a Muslim investigative team on the ground as soon as possible. In my experience most Muslims are very eager to accommodate the authorities and demonstrate that they have assimilated and are loyal to their adopted country. I strongly suspect the participants were given incentives they could not refuse and their participation was demanded as a condition of their continuing to enjoy unencumbered residency in New Zealand.              The full interview can be read here.

My guess is that, initially, the Muslims were asked to participate in the police mass-casualty training exercise, and that, when the exercise "went live", they were no longer able to back out. Now they are trapped in a lie that is "too big to fail", since the credibility of all concerned, including the nation, is at stake. That's why both they and the authorities ignore the issues, base their case entirely on the emotional testimonies of "survivors" and "rescuers", and dismiss any challenges to the official narrative as "conspiracy theories". In this way, with the connivance of a complicit media, an amateurish smoke-and-mirrors show is able to masquerade as reality. Note: Steele died on August 29, 2021, reportedly after contracting Covid-19, being treated with the toxic drug Remdesivir, and finally being put on a ventilator.

---

Diary of events that followed the arrest of the suspect

March 26, 2019: The Government announces a royal commission of inquiry into the "Christchurch terror attacks", and promises that it will "leave no stone unturned" in its attempt to "get to the bottom of how the terrorism occurred". See here.

April 11, 2019: "New Zealand shooting video wasn’t ‘gruesome’ enough to flag, says Facebook," is the headline at news.com.au today.

August 25, 2019: Royal commission member Jacqui Caine addresses the Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand.

February, 2020: The Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand (FIANZ) publishes its submission to the royal commission. This describes InfoWars as "a website run by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones", cites the Network Contagion Research Institute and the ADL Center on Extremism, and repeatedly refers to the "rules-based international order". So it's not surprising to find FIANZ condemning Russia for its alleged "strategic objectives of destabilising the international order; discrediting the global liberal hegemony by challenging the 'internal coherence' of open societies; weakening NATO; and disintegrating the European Union". Poor Russia! One might have expected it to receive a little credit for saving Syria from the head-chopping jihadists between 2015 and 2020. And one might have thought that FIANZ would remember what NATO did to Afghanistan.

March 26, 2020: Tarrant today changed his plea to guilty, and was automatically convicted. There will thus be no trial — and no scrutiny of the alleged shootings' glaring anomalies, which have been airbrushed out of history. A report on the day's events is here. The judge's minute of the court hearing is here. Meanwhile, the reader should note that this guilty plea — which was extremely convenient for the Ardern regime — came on the first day of the national lockdown (ostensibly) designed to halt the spread of COVID-19.

July 6, 2020: The Islamic Women's Council says there was a threat to burn a Qur'an outside a mosque on the day of the Christchurch "shootings". Another "incredible coincidence"?

July 13, 2020: Tarrant today dismissed his lawyers, and said he would represent himself at the sentencing hearing.

August 27, 2020: The sentencing report of Justice Cameron Mander. For some of the discrepancies between this and the evidence of the "live stream" of the "attack", see Kufr Club.

December 8, 2020: The royal commission issues its report. This examines and discusses only the events leading up to the "terrorist attack". Click here for an NZHerald article on the commission's report.

October 21, 2021~ : Chief Coroner Judge Deborah Marshall confirms she has opened a coronial inquiry into the Christchurch mosque "shootings".

---

Footnote: The witch hunt is on: See "Christchurch mosque attack: Up to 14 years' jail for video sharers as Commissioner asks Facebook to give police names" at nzherald.co.nz. The article by Chris Keall, dated March 19, 2019, begins: "Chief Censor David Shanks has officially classified the full 17-minute video of the fatal Christchurch shootings, which occurred on Friday 15 March, as 'objectionable' — meaning it is banned. That raises the prospect of a fine of up to $10,000 or up to 14 years' jail for anyone who shares the clip — and this morning, Privacy Commissioner John Edwards called on Facebook to share names with police. It is an offence to share this material as soon as it is produced, and the timing of the official classification does not affect the ability of police and enforcement agencies to prosecute offences under the Films, Videos & Publications Classification Act 1993, Shanks says. 'Facebook should be notifying the police of the account names of people who have shared this content,' Edwards told RNZ this morning. 'It's not a conflict I think because at the core there is a very egregious offence to the dignity and the rights to privacy of the victims'."

Actually, you would hard-pressed to identify anyone in the video. Those who have viewed it say all the "bodies" are (conveniently?) face-down. Meanwhile, one wonders why viewing the film of the Kennedy assassination is not a "very egregious offence to the dignity and the right to privacy" of the late president. It is hard to escape the conclusion that the elite, in this case, are (a) trying to hide something, and (b) trying to infantalize and criminalize the entire population, to lock us all into a state of ignorance, subservience and fear. This is the new feudalism, which surveillance technology will make more sinister than the last. See the Philip Arps case. See also Whose Platform Is It? The case of Nathan Symington, featuring Omar Nabi. And don't miss Kiwi Farms' obscene slapdown of the New Zealand Police.