'How could it happen here?' False-flag terror comes to NZ
The following two articles were written in mid-2019, and were formerly part of my index page. I have retained them here mainly because the first article, in a panel headed "Payback?", looks at some of the actors who were probably involved, if only in an advisory capacity, in the planning and/or execution of the Christchurch false-flag attacks. The above question — "How could it happen here?", i.e. in remote, "peaceful New Zealand" — is often the first that is asked by those who still don't realize that such "attacks" are staged for a reason — in this case, to show that nowhere is safe, that nowhere is beyond the reach of the bogeyman — and that, of course, you need more protection from the Dear Leader/Single Source of Truth.
At the time of writing, the consensus among independent analysts (i.e. not academic or media stooges) is that the shooting has all the hallmarks of a false-flag operation by that nebulous entity known as the New World Order. (See "Payback?" panel below.) If it is such an operation — and I am inclined to think it is — Tarrant is agent, rather than instigator.
His motive, which we were repeatedly told was a desire to "divide the community", is therefore irrelevant. One can also rule out any such motivation among the planners of the operation.
Poles apart: Two reactions to the Christchurch 'terror attack'
• How to think in three simple steps: (1) Raise index finger to temple, (2) Scratch vigorously, (3) Engage brain.
All this constitutes the sinister subtext of the lovey-dovey line being fed to us by the legacy media in the aftermath of the Christchurch event. The draconian bans on disseminating, or even viewing, Tarrant's manifesto and video are part of the overall crackdown — as is the absurd claim we should not give the terrorist "oxygen" by mentioning his name.
Payback? Did Israel hijack the drill and turn it into 'reality'?
"Payback" by Israel for perceived hostile actions by New Zealand is another possibility. "Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly told New Zealand’s foreign minister that support for a UN resolution condemning Israeli settlement-building in the occupied territories would be viewed as a 'declaration of war' ”. — The Guardian, December 28, 2016. See here.
The triumph of darkness in the "Mosque of the Light'
March 15, 2019, was, indeed, "one of New Zealand's darkest days", but not, in my opinion, for the reasons given by the Government. For a start, we are now locked into a farrago of fact and fiction that cannot be teased apart. And if you do attempt the exercise — or, worse, if you analyze the shooter's "live-stream" — you are judged mentally sick and in need of psychiatric treatment and/or imprisonment for up to 14 years.
By selling us illusion, and then insisting we accept it as reality, the elite are gaslighting us. They know that sooner or later — if not already — it will be impossible for the aver-
age person to distinguish between the two. In other words, the individual will, consciously or unconsciously, lose any trust they previ-
ously had in their ability to make judgments. The elite will thus be the arbiter of all things.
Deaths can occur in any such operation, especially if someone strays from the script or if something untoward happens. But as a rule, the perpetrators don't want to cause deaths. That's because (a) any death is a complication that can lead to legal problems, (b) real deaths are unnecessary when they can be faked, and (c) the ideal operation is one in which people believe there have been fatalities when, in reality, there haven't been any. The latter represents the acme of the psyop.
In another tweet, Robichaux says that when he submitted the same ad, but with the keyword "Muslim", it was OK'd. The liberal Left doesn't like Christianity because it postulates the existence of an Absolute. This is anathema to the Left, which wants everything to be based on the shifting sands of relativity. The Left doesn't like Islam for the same reason, of course. But at this juncture, it sees an opportunity to use Islam to weaken Western society and prevent the emergence of an effective opposition to the globalist agenda. To digress: I maintain the liberal Left also dislikes culture, despite its avowed dedication to "multiculturalism". Ultimately, it would like to reduce all cultures to vestigial status. In other words, once a year, you would put on a grass skirt and do a dance on a stage. Or once a year, you would wear a shamrock on your lapel. Then you would return to the joys of everyday life in the surveillance state.
It's tempting to simply assert that the state is corrupt. More to the point, however, is the observation that there are people in the state structure whose primary allegiance is to the New World Order/World Economic Forum, and who are determined to mold New Zealand to its globalist ideals. There are various ways in which they can do this. First, they can co-opt the mainstream media, and ensure it supports the official narrative on any controversial issue — often by denying there is any controversy in the first place! Then they can either co-opt or neutralize the various sectors of society. The unions have long gone as an effective political force, and the potent student/peace movement of the 1960s is now a distant memory.
"Thank you" for what? For the way in which Muslims were enticed into what must, for most, have initially been seen as no more than an anti-terrorism exercise in which they could play a colorful and exciting part? For the way in which Muslims were led, step by step, into a labyrinth of lies, which now collectively form the Lie That Is Too Big to Fail?
Real feet and fake feet: They think we can't tell the difference
Almost all the Muslims in New Zealand are Asians and North Africans, who have broad, rough, brown feet — as seen above, during prayers in Hagley Park, Christchurch. In contrast, the feet of the "victims" of Tarrant's alleged shooting rampage (see inset) are long, thin, delicate and white, like the feet of mannequins. Note, too, the spindly ankles.
As we have seen, in the image referenced above, the role of "mosque welcomer" has been assigned to the Afghan Daoud Nabi. But oddly, it is not his body that lies in the entrance to the mosque. The "body" there is of a much younger man, who is not wearing the Afghan dess that Nabi customarily wore. So what happened? One suggestion, from Peekay Truth, is that Nabi, who was 71, died of natural causes between the making of the "live-stream" and the alleged staging of the "attack" on March 15, and was posthumously slotted into the drama. If this happened, Peekay Truth adds, Nabi's funeral was genuine — almost certainly the only genuine funeral that was held during the subsequent two weeks. (See "Peekay Destroys the Christchurch Shooting" at archive.org.)
Aftermath of "tragedy": Living it up in the UAE — one of the perpetrators of the genocide in Yemen. Click here to view another picture of the two imams being feted. Click here to see celebrities offering their condolences at Al Noor.
Faux hijabs to the fore in Christchurch's Carnival of Grief
How many Muslims were disturbed, as I was, by the carnival of grief that followed the alleged shootings? Can any Muslim claim to be unaware of the "sin" of excessive mourning (see below), especially when this is accompanied by singing and performances of the haka — a war dance that Turkey once banned as obscene. Within hours, the frontages of mosques around the country became tableaus of floral wreaths and bouquets, interspersed with flags and messages of misplaced condolence. The irony is that many of the latter undoubtedly came from people who previously expressed a low opinion of Muslims, and predicted their presence in the country would eventually cause problems. All were seemingly caught up in the national catharsis. And now, of course, they won't hear of anything that challenges their cherished illusion. Any suggestion the official narrative is, in reality, a pack of lies can only be seen as evidence of Islamophobia. Honest skepticism is an impossibility.• Above right, Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam, a man who once appeared to call for the execution of novelist Salman Rushdie, does his thing at the national memorial service for "victims" of the "terrorist attack". The service was held on March 29, 2019, in Hagley Park, Christchurch.
The above passages are from The religious ruling for lamentation and mourning at islamteaching.com.
Armed police? Flags and flowers? An honor guard of non-Muslim women wearing faux hijab? This is bizarre. What will come next? Hawkers selling trinkets made from empty bullet casings? (Outside Al Noor Mosque, Friday, May 3, 2019.) Although the contentious issue of faux hijab is beyond the scope of this study, I have saved a few articles on the subject: 1, 2, 3, 4.
In Islamic eschatology, the Dajjal is the Great Deceiver who takes the stage during the End Times.
History and myth combine in gunman's incredible graffitiThe graffiti on the "guns" used by "Tarrant" refer to the following (list compiled by u/Obijohn3 on Reddit):
Tours 732: Battle in modern-day France, when the Frankish soldiers under Charles Martel turned back an invasion by the Umayyad general Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd Allah Al-Ghafiqi. The battle ended in a slaughter and complete retreat of the Arab forces (even being forced to leave behind their spoils), thus gaining Charles fame for being the savior of Europe.