The simple answer is: We don't know, and probably never will — just as we don't know who was ultimately responsible for most of the staged terror events of the past 75 years. It's worthwhile, however, to consider a few possibilities. (Alternatively, click here to go to the homepage.)
On December 24, 2024, a masked man claiming to be a Mossad operative told the news program 60 Minutes: "We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage.” (He was speaking in the context of the Israeli "pager attack" on members of Hezbollah.)
According to journalist Ron Suskind, in an article in The New York Times in 2004, presidential adviser Karl Rove said something similar: "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." Continued...
Whatever it was, it has effectively eclipsed the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza.
The most interesting allegation made in the above video — originally posted on March 19, 2019 — is that "the New Zealand Government killed its own people in order to facilitate the deception".
The above video picks up the difference between the face in the rear-view mirror of the car, as it turns into the alley, and the selfie shown earlier in the so-called live stream of the first attack.

This video, from November 15, 2023, asks: "Does the NZ Government have something to hide?"
Continued from above... Even if the Mossad/Rove statements — as reported and/or attributed — are not wholly authentic, they say something about the worldview of the Western ruling elite, whose membership transcends the bounds of formal government. (That's why one should be alert to the common false binary: "If it wasn't done by a terrorist, it must have been done by the Government.")
German historian Wolfgang Eggert, who "believes that modern history is dominated by the Cabalistic plot to fulfill Biblical prophesy", speculates that "Israeli intel [i.e. Mossad] . . . learned what was being prepared [i.e. an anti-terror drill in Christchurch] and decided to saddle-up this virtual action, as they did . . . during . . . 9/11, 7/7, Oslo-Utoya . . ." (Quotes from henrymakow.com, which is currently blocked by Malwarebytes.) Eggert's verdict on the gunman's "live stream": "It was a 'drill film'. It was only meant to be seen and analyzed by the agents of the drill-team training on the 15th of March for a virtual terror incident . . . "
Some proponents of the "saddle-up" theory say Israel had a motive to "punish" New Zealand, and quote from The Guardian's pertinent article of December 28, 2016: "Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly told New Zealand's foreign minister that support for a UN resolution condemning Israeli settlement-building in the occupied territories would be viewed as a 'declaration of war' ". See here.
At the time of writing — September 22, 2025 — the above video is the first of five The People's Voice videos that take an in-depth look at the Charlie Kirk case. All are worth watching.
But if the events of March 15 were intended to be a punishment, they ironically elevated and empowered the Ardern regime — for the reasons given on the homepage of this website. And the New Zealand public suffered only by being bomboozled into buying an ocean of floral tributes to the supposed victims of what was sententiously described as "one of New Zealand's darkest days".
Another possibility is that there is a shadowy circle of "security" personnel, united by a common modus operadi, that can be called on at any time and in any place to stage "terrorist attacks" that can then be used as catalysts for social/policy change desired by the globalist elite. The extent to which any such group is also united by an interest in the occult (and especially Freemasonry) is a further subject for endless speculation. Suffice it to say the Christchurch attacks left evidence of Masonic influence in the removal of the shoes of Ansi Alibava and their placement beside her "body".

By selling us illusion, and then insisting we accept it as reality, the elite are gaslighting us. They know that sooner or later — if not already — it will be impossible for the average person to distinguish between the two. In other words, the individual will, consciously or unconscious-
ly, lose any trust they formerly had in their abil-
ity to make judgments. The elite — the "ex-
perts" — will thus be the arbiter of all things.
In Chronicles of False Flag Terror, Nick Kollerstrom writes: "We can be confident that these events are 'state-sponsored,' meaning set up and created by the 'Axis of Evil', CIA-Mossad-MI6. In general, we cannot know to what extent one or another of these intelligence agencies is involved, as they are so closely interlinked."
Researcher Charlie Robinson, speaking in this context, has referred to the ad hoc assemblage of spooks and stuntmen as a "NATO traveling roadshow" — a suggestion, perhaps, that false-flag terrorist attacks can also be seen as gruesome entertainment for the credulous masses. See the Operation Gladio page for one of Robertson's videos.
Robinson further maintains that "organic" terrorist attacks are always possible, but are relatively rare. Most such attacks, and especially those that "piggyback" on a police/security drill that "coincidentally" has the same scenario, and/or are immediately preceded by a table-top exercise that "coincidentally" envisages the scenario that later unfolds, should be regarded as synthetic. (Note that the March 15 event meets both these conditions, right down to the "victims" of the "real" incident being taken to the hospital that the police used in their staged incident that is "coincidentally" just winding up.)
"We also hope to drive home the shocking realization that not only were military and intel-
ligence agencies in charge of COVID in all of these countries, but the response to what was represented as a public health crisis was coordinated through military alliances, including NATO." — Debbie Lerman & Sasha Latypova in The COVID Dossier at Substack.
With Kollerstrom's statement in mind, one has to wonder whether New Zealand's security services should be added to the above "axis", albeit in a subordinate role. After all, in the photo we have of the "body" of Ansi Alibava there are several police officers standing around. They can't have failed to notice that the "body" has no head, and that a metal or plastic tube protrudes from the torso where the head formerly fitted on. (My suspicion is that the head was run over by the gunman's car as he exited the alley, and later had to be removed because it was too obviously not a crushed human skull.)
Incidentally, a Mossad spy ring was unearthed in Christchurch in 2011, when one of its members, Ofer Mizrahi, had the misfortune to be killed by falling masonry. The Southland Times said the group was suspected of trying to hack into the country's police computer system. See here. And see how the sycophantic Federation of Islamic Associations joined the chorus of condemnation of Ahmed Bhamji, chairman of the Mt Roskill Masjid E Umar, who told a Love Aotearoa Hate Racism rally in Aotea Square, Auckland, that he saw Mossad as a possible source of funding for the Christchurch "terrorist".
Another person with interesting opinions is "former Mossad agent" Marc Delantre. (See The Various faces of Brenton Tarrant) He maintains the fake shooting (represented by the "live stream") masks a real shooting, and that the anomalies of the former are deliberate insertions designed to keep "truth seeker[s], experts and other smart people" distracted. In other words, it is a device to "control the opposition" — in the time-honored tradition of rogue intelligence agencies. Hence the "sandbox theory", as espoused by former Christchurch resident Paul Scott and others. This suggests a patently false narrative sets the parameters of a "sandbox", i.e. playpen, in which skeptics are corralled, surveilled and managed. The skeptics pick the narrative to pieces but get nowhere. Eventually, they run out of steam, lose interest and drift away. They don't think of looking for answers outside the sandbox, which is where the creators of the narrative operate. The principle is similar to that of the conjurer — divert attention to one side of the stage, while the deed is done on the other.

In a previous version of this page, I discussed the issue of the "mystery car" that is parked immediately to the left of the main entrance of Al Noor Mosque — until it is driven away while the gunman is reentering the mosque compound via the carpark entrance to the left of the main entrance. I pointed out that the ownership of the car could lead us to one of the parties to the mosque shooting deception. (See also the dedicated page here.)
The problem was that Greg Hallett, the source of the image, mistyped the registration number, FQH875, as FQM875 in the RightCar form (shown on the left), and then claimed, when the vehicle was "Not found", that this meant it was a vehicle "owned by the NZ Security Intelligence Service (SIS) or Internal Affairs (IA) [and used] as a throw-away vehicle [in] bumper-to-bumpers, car-ramming and hit-&-runs".
Fortunately, a quick check of my entire website revealed that all other references to the car had stated its rego correctly. The error was picked up in June 2024 by fellow researcher Roger Morris.
According to Morris, "a passing cyclist" later photographed the car (see right) parked outside 66a Milton Street, Somerfield, Christchurch — a property "found registered in the name ALNOBANI LIMITED (8085637) / Khaled Majed Abdelrauof ALNOBANI / H451260 [Takeaway food retailing]". Editing note: "Abdelrauof" should ideally read "Abdelrauf", "Ar-Rauf" ("The Benign One") being one of the "99 names of Allah". Morris' email message continues: "In later media coverage of the mosque attack, one Khaled Alnobani is filmed discussing the jammed lock on the blocked 'escape' door, set into the south-eastern wing of the Mosque prayer room" (see the picture below).

Update 16.01.25: A reader has written to say: "I took a screenshot of that car [see below] parked outside a house on Milton St, with a 'Labour" sign. Saw it on a Max Igan podcast..."
The Muslims' allegiance to "Young Global Leader" Jacinda Ardern was effusive, to say the least.
March 15, 2019, was, indeed, "one of New Zealand's darkest days", but not, in my opinion, for the reasons given by the Government. For a start, we are now locked into a farrago of fact and fiction that cannot be teased apart. And if you do attempt the exercise — or, worse, if you analyze the shooter's "live-stream" — you are judged mentally sick and in need of psychiatric treatment and/or imprisonment for up to 14 years.
If the past is anything to go by, the Powers That Be will eventually trundle out pop psychologist Nigel Latta, who will tell the nation, in his folksy manner, how emotionally deficient we questioners of the official narrative are. Update 24.03.26: Sadly, Nigel Latta died of stomach cancer on September 30, 2025. He was 58.
Already, predictably, we are being told that we are insensitive to the "bereaved" relatives of the dead, who have been hurt twice — first by the loss of their loved ones, and then by the denial of their loss by "conspiracy theorists". But I, for one, have never claimed, categorically, that no one died in this or any other false-flag terrorist attack.
Deaths can occur in any such operation, especially if someone strays from the script or if something untoward happens. But as a rule, the perpetrators don't want to cause deaths. That's because (a) any death is a complication that can lead to legal problems, (b) real deaths are unnecessary when they can be faked, and (c) the ideal operation is one in which people believe there have been fatalities when, in reality, there haven't been any. The latter represents the acme of the psyop.
The perps also know that even if no one dies in a "terror attack", they will still be able to draw up a list of the dead and wounded that will be accepted without question in a court of law. They have been staging these deceptions for about 70 years, and know that, because the public is gullible and legal proceedings are perfunctory, they can continue their modus operandi almost indefinitely.
Although they operate in the shadows, they leave hints of who they are and what they plan to do next — possibly to taunt those who know how to read their signs. But according to Danish-born analyst Ole Dammegard, another of their perverse aims is to safeguard their karma.
Their rationale is: "Out of the goodness of our heart, we gave you several clues. If you were too dumb to pick them up, that's your problem. We can't be held responsible for your stupidity."
Dammegard has also spoken of the pair of shoes, signifying "homage to the sacred space", that is often left at the scene of a murder. In Free-
masonry, this ritual removal of the shoes is known as the Rite of Dis-
calceation. In further explanation, Dammegard has said a single shoe, when placed at the scene of an "event", means "this was done volun-
tarily". (Note, in passing, Ardern's past links with the Freemasons. Note, too, Gordon Duff's allegation, in The Millennium Report of March 18, 2019, that "most of [New Zealand's] officials are Masonic".) Listen to Dammegard speaking to Vinny Eastwood on March 16, 2019.
But these Masonic idiosyncrasies are not all. Taken as a whole, the Christchurch "shootings" could be said to represent the triumph of darkness over light in a city that memorializes Christ, the "Light of the World", and in a mosque dedicated to "The Light" ("Al Noor"). And this is where things become problematic for the Muslim community in New Zealand. For if the Muslims have sided with the globalist elite — the "dark hand" behind the false-flag terrorism of the past 60 years — they have, figuratively speaking, made a compact with the devil — what could also be described as a Faustian bargain.
Clearly, the nation's Muslims, and especially those of Canterbury, have gained a lot. On March 25, 2019, Radio New Zealand reported that more than $15.7 million had already been donated to Victim Support and other agencies to assist people claiming to have suffered as a result of the "terror attacks". Then, on November 29, 2019, the Emirates News Agency reported Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters as saying, during a visit to the UAE, that the New Zealand Government had "put together a package to ensure that families of the victims would be taken care of for the rest of their lives". Meanwhile, the status of Islam has risen remarkably — to such an extent that an article warning of the "dangers of Muslim immigration" would today be almost impossible to write. Furthermore, the Muslims can look forward to increased protection from all forms of "hate speech", which increasingly includes anything they find "offensive". But it is indisputable that they, and the rest of the community, have also lost a lot.
One immediate consequence of "one of New Zealand's darkest days" is the wholesale assault on freedom of speech. We are now in the grip of a frenzy of censorship that is stripping us of rights our forebears fought and died for over many centuries. (See below.) Internationally, this censorship is driven by an outfit called the Trust Project, which promotes the execrable corporate media ("news with integrity") while forcing those with real integrity out of business. But sadly, most people — especially young people — are today so indoctrinated they don't even notice what is going on.
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters was singing from the old song sheet in 2005, when he said in a speech entitled The End of Tolerance: "In New Zealand the Muslim community have been quick to show us their more moderate face; but as some media reports have shown, there is a militant underbelly here as well.
These two groups, the moderate and militant, fit hand and glove everywhere they exist. Underneath it all the agenda is to promote fundamentalist Islam.
Indeed, these groups are like the mythical Hydra — a serpent underbelly with multiple heads capable of striking at any time and in any direction." How the times have changed!
How many Muslims were disturbed, as I was, by the carnival of grief that followed the alleged shootings? Can any Muslim claim to be unaware of the "sin" of excessive mourning (see below), especially when this is accompanied by singing and performances of the haka — a war dance that Turkey once banned as obscene. Within hours, the frontages of mosques around the country became tableaus of floral wreaths and bouquets, interspersed with flags and messages of misplaced condolence. The irony is that many of the latter undoubtedly came from people who previously expressed a low opinion of Muslims, and predicted their presence in the country would eventually cause problems. All were seemingly caught up in the national catharsis. And now, of course, they won't hear of anything that challenges their cherished illusion. Any suggestion the official narrative is, in reality, a pack of lies can only be seen as evidence of Islamophobia. Honest skepticism is an impossibility.
Above right, Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam, a man who once appeared to call for the execution of novelist Salman Rushdie, does his thing at the national memorial service for "victims" of the "terrorist attack". The service was held on March 29, 2019, in Hagley Park, Christchurch.
The above passages are from Religious ruling for lamentation and mourning at islamteaching.com.
Tours 732: Battle in modern-day France, when the Frankish soldiers under Charles Martel turned back an invasion by the Umayyad general Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd Allah Al-Ghafiqi. The battle ended in a slaughter and complete retreat of the Arab forces (even being forced to leave behind their spoils), thus gaining Charles fame for being the savior of Europe.
Charles Martel: Previously mentioned leader of Francia and founder of the Carolingian dynasty, also known as Charles the Hammer. He is one of the fathers of feudalism, and his grandson Charlemagne is often regarded as the father of Western civilization.
Acre 1189: First battle of the Third Crusade. Ended in a Christian victory, thanks to King Richard the Lionheart, thus dashing Saladin's (sultan of Egypt) hopes of completely destroying the Levantine Crusader states.
Lepanto 1571: Naval engagement off the coast of modern-day Greece between the Holy League (a coalition of Catholic states), which was backing up the Venetians, and the Ottoman Empire. Ended in a disastrous defeat for the Ottomans, and signaled the end of their dominance over the Mediterranean, though they would end up winning the war against Venice and taking Cyprus.
Sources for possible future reference: Henry Makow Ph.D: https://henrymakow.com/2019/03/Christchurch-Video-22-Discrepancies.html and https://henrymakow.com/2019/03/shooter-video-is-a-phoney.html | Emirates News Agency: https://www.wam.ae/en/details/1395302807177
As the alleged gunman turns into the alley beside the mosque, we get several glimpses of his face in the rearview mirror. Is this the face we saw earlier, when he inexplicably parked for a minute while en route to the mosque? See the video on the left, and also the full Forensic Video Analysis Report, Pages 5-10.
Remember how a pandemic preparedness exercise immedi-Information on the Bondi Beach incident has been added to this page. A question I would like to ask is: Why was Arsen Ostrovsky hospitalized, when he had suffered no more than a nick to his scalp? (See here.) I once had an operation on my scalp, after which they simply stitched me up and sent me home. — 24.03.26
I've added several references to Forensic Video Analysis Report, by Gareth Jacob. See above, the video on the left, and the page dedicated to the weapons used in the alleged shooting. — 10.02.26
A new year called for a new website template, especially as the old one was compromised, principally, by its lack of responsivity to screen sizes smaller than those of desktop computers. I hope to eventually switch all my pages to this improved format. — 15.01.26
To the best of my knowledge, the material in this website has never been addressed, or even acknowledged, by any of the proponents of the official narrative, including the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the alleged shootings. The minuscule amount of criticism that has come my way has been pitiful — invariably along the lines of "It's all conspiracy theory", or "It's all nonsense". One suspects the framers of the official narrative are confident they have "flooded the zone" with so much hype and hysteria, the occasional call for sober analysis will always be drowned out. — 17.01.26